There weren't till todayWow, thanks for mentioning this, I didn't catch that there was a demo license available...!


But would that 2 studio recordings concept work with Brass?I predict that Synchron-ized Brass will be their next library on August 16th![]()

Synchron-ized = a direct port of the VI Brass libraries with quality of life updates for the Synchron Player. But I'd love to see a Duality Brass library too hahahahaBut would that 2 studio recordings concept work with Brass?![]()
Just saw that, too! Downloading Duality now. I really wish other big players would allow this.Wow, thanks for mentioning this, I didn't catch that there was a demo license available...!
Oh i just realized i misread your post. Sorry about that.Synchron-ized = a direct port of the VI Brass libraries with quality of life updates for the Synchron Player. But I'd love to see a Duality Brass library too hahahaha
I also find this very odd, because these libraries were (or should be) recorded in situ and at the same gain levels. If it were done right, you wouldn't need any volume balance, isn't it? But I don't know for sure. I know that Spitfire doesn't touch the values at all, at least with the SSO range (from what I read here in the forum). Curious is that when I use these values for the VI instruments it's a 100% match, and these were recorded centered and not in situ. Very odd...Does anybody know why the Duality Strings default master volumes are all over the place in the default patches?
For instance when loading the standalone player:
Violins 1: default volume 90
Violins 2: default volume 90
Violas: default volume 90
Cellos: default volume 64
Double Bass: default volume 71
I find this a little odd as normally I would expect the same master volume in each instrument to give the correct balance. I'm not sure if I should be setting my DAW / Dorico tracks to these MIDI volumes to match the default patches or not.
Agreed. I won’t even use them. I find because of the bases I can’t balance the library properly so I use other libraries for the foundationIn SSP, the default CC7 volumes are :
- V1 101
- V2 95
- Vla 95
- Cello 95
- Basses 71
I always felt the Basses are weak, I usually raise them by 3dB. The strange thing is that in the Ensemble patch, the Basses are ok (and around 3dB more than in the Basses patch).
But even with this correction I find that some ranges/notes still are weak. For me it's very difficult to have warm and well balanced basses in a string writing with SSP, I have to cheat all the time.
This is very speculative, but since all the sections aren't in the same room playing at the same time and listening to each other, i could easily imagine their levels not being perfectly balanced without some tweaking. Maybe most devs do this tweaking to the audio data itself and we don't even see it, and VSL is being extra-transparent?I also find this very odd, because these libraries were (or should be) recorded in situ and at the same gain levels. If it were done right, you wouldn't need any volume balance, isn't it? But I don't know for sure. I know that Spitfire doesn't touch the values at all, at least with the SSO range (from what I read here in the forum). Curious is that when I use these values for the VI instruments it's a 100% match, and these were recorded centered and not in situ. Very odd...
About time too!You’re back!?!!!?!!