I don’t have any.
Honestly, I don’t like *anything* I have in the woodwinds department: Chris Hein's WW (some clever Kontakt-ideas but mostly poor-sounding, bland source samples; and always very mono), Cinesamples' WW (always sounded more like a first, very rough draft for a library than an actual library to me), VSL (generic sounding, characterless nothingness with a vague hint of dead woodwind to it), Berlin Winds (if only the quality of the Expansion where also that of the core library …), Spitfire’s BML Winds (only so-and-so articulation-wise and, what’s worse, some of those volumes were never properly finished), 8dio Claire (very uneven, inconsistent and having twice as many problems as qualities), …
Nearly all woodwind libraries sound like Lazy Sunday Afternoon projects to me. Or an afterthought. Things you do when your heart’s not really into it. Or a task taken on, somewhat reluctantly, in between bigger projects and approached with only half the focus, budget, effort and commitment than is required, inevitably resulting in second-rate, careless, superficial work which is then dressed up with cheap trickery to make it as presentable as possible.
It’s incomprehensible, I find, that after 25 years of orchestral sampling, with all the technical progress that has been made during that time, and the gazillion orchestral libraries that have been made, there is still not a single decent woodwinds library available. It just doesn’t exist. When it comes to woodwinds, it feels like we're living in a sort of Groundhog Year: every day you wake up, it's still 1997.
Here and there, there are a few isolated patches that I can work with, and sometimes, one of the smaller libraries may contain a nice surprise or two, but by and large, Virtual Woodwind Land, to me, is a dull, barren waste of musically unsatisfying and sonically inferior efforts that will compromise just about every phrase you give to them and every orchestration they’re part of.
_