I don't think we know. The CEO change came in the wake of the controversy over Henson and perceived mishandling of that situation. (How exactly that situation might have been handled better has never many clear to me, since it was a case of SF, the company, being presented with only bad options.) I presume there were also some very lackluster revenue numbers, which may or may not have been related to the Henson controversy—both because of the way the matter was handled and because Henson was a key figure driving SF's approach to marketing.
SF's focus now seems to be around AR1 and shoring up regular income streams from past products. I would not be surprised if SF's predictable regular sales—40% off libraries, 30% off bundles in December, May, and August—no longer happen, or at least not at those discount points. Not that SF won't have equivalent sales of some sort, but I expect they might appear in a more irregular fashion, closer to what OT or Strezov does.
Labs always seemed an initiative pushed mostly by Henson, so beyond the fact that Labs do not contribute to income streams, Henson's departure would likely mean less advocating within the company for resources to go to Labs.