The mentality is getting really annoying among people who use the "then don't buy it" response to a simple question and believing it has something to do with entitlement when no one was angry about the price point at all. I had mentioned originally about a further discount for people who owned both as an inquiry only because I saw some people were using another coupon to bring the price down further on a product that wasn't Ark related as part of a promotion and I figured it would be worth mentioning that people who own both Arks would appreciate the same type of loyalty deal. I will be buying the product either way.
To me, entitlement would be arguing that the price is too high and we DESERVE a larger discount and I've not seen anyone really do that here. I think most of us who are interested will be buying it regardless but it never hurts to ask; especially at this time of year when we have more money flying out the door than normal.
It's a perfectly valid and reasonable thing to inquire as to the extent of the discount one can get based on one's prior purchases with a given developer. Anyone -- myself included -- would do that. That's not the issue here. It was the other poster's usage of the word "shouldn't" that -- to me -- implied a sense of entitlement rather than an attempt to merely get a simple question answered. There's a difference between asking "do owners of both Arks get an additional 50 euros off" vs "shouldn't owners of both Arks get an additional 50 euros off".
Again, I may have inferred incorrectly and if I did I sincerely do apologize. But that individual -- or any individual for that matter -- aside, there is no question that there are many on here who do have that sense of entitlement that I alluded to. It's something that made itself painfully obvious in the midst of the recent Black Friday deals.
Once again, no disrespect was meant to you @Mystic or anyone else.