So here are my thoughts - they've definitely put in the effort in terms of aggregating material. Can't fault them for that. However, a lot of the course is instrument history and information that you will find elsewhere (many other orchestration courses out there seem to include this too - Thinkspace, Berklee, etc). There's mostly text-based content, very little video content apart from some score excerpts with various aspects highlighted (the melody is in the first violins, etc) with minimal voiceovers. In fact, in general, the course is extremely light on actual orchestration information - section blends, voicing examples / choices, why certain orchestration is preferred over other choices, etc. I ended up paying extra for the film score style examples and those are interesting, but once again, pretty light on actual information in my opinion. It's more of a "here's what they did" vs. a "here's why they did it" type of thing. I prefer having at least some of the latter and to see some more practical application (like orchestrating an original piece or something).
Also, the assignments seem mostly like extremely tedious busy work - transpose this line for all of these instruments like Clarinet in Bb, etc. While that may be good practice for some, as a DAW-based composer / hobbyist, that is not how I want to spend my free time. I couldn't check out the full course because of their refund policy limiting you to 30% of material (not sure if I went over that or not), but anyway, I've requested a refund personally. I still prefer Evenant's approach to teaching things though I may also check out Don Bodin's course here, which seems like more practical and hands on application
https://slrworkshops.teachable.com/p/a-foundation-for-mastering-virtual-orchestration