What's new

Orchestral score notation with tacet instruments

Buddy

Member
When you're cooking up the conductor's score for a piece where certain instruments (oboe, clar, bsn, tpt) are tacet the whole time, do you leave their staves in as placeholders with extended rests or delete them entirely?

Less staves would seem easier to read, but then I could also imagine conductors' eyes get trained to expect parts in certain places and would prefer the placeholder parts. Insight appreciated.
 
If the instrument isn't in a piece. Don't put a staff for them in the score. Doing so may make a conductor flip through a score looking for those instruments' entrances.

If you're doing a recording session for something like a film and have multiple cues with the same ensemble, then leave them in and merely mark them tacet at the beginning of the cues on which they don't play. That way when you're flying through a pile of scores, the layout doesn't change from one to the next.

Horses for courses. :)
 
If the instrument isn't in a piece. Don't put a staff for them in the score. Doing so may make a conductor flip through a score looking for those instruments' entrances.

If you're doing a recording session for something like a film and have multiple cues with the same ensemble, then leave them in and merely mark them tacet at the beginning of the cues on which they don't play. That way when you're flying through a pile of scores, the layout doesn't change from one to the next.

Horses for courses. :)

Makes total sense, very helpful. Thank you!
 
I also leave empty staves when writing for a specific band or orchestra. So it looks more like a musical decision to have them tacet and not just written for the wrong setting. And in a rehearsal or concert situation it's easier for a musician to have an empty sheet instead of looking for their non existing part and get panic because they can't find it. A piece of paper with the song title and tacet can avoid a lot of discussion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JJP
Top Bottom