Ok...you don't have to be like that. I was just giving my opinion that I think music should be memorable and show a little talent in the composition. I guess I just can't understand how 4 notes + 4 chords + a few crescendos and some synth...rinse and repeat classifies as 'talented' composing....I just don't get it.
Yes, that was exactly my point, there is something to learn, why it's popular, how it's made, etc. You might not be interested in learning that particular thing, and that's ok, but there might be something more than the number of notes or chords, or even the composition.
Also I don't think "talent" means anything, it's as subjective as "good music".
For trailers, it may be a good thing that you don't remember any of the music, because the trailer is all about the movie. It's there to make the movie look/sound cool, the audience should focus on the pictures, and when it's over the goal is that they want to see that movie, not buy the tune or even learn more about the composer.
And I think it require some kind of talent (even in the composition part) to do that. Not the same skills as composing a 10 minutes piece with memorable themes and tons of modulations, sure, but it still need some kind of "talent". Maybe the composer was lucky, he found 4 random chords and 4 notes, it sounded good, and it's on a trailer. But maybe he knew exactly what he was doing, and there is a justification for each note.
You might not find that talent valuable, but yeah, it's not an absolute fact.
Ok...you don't have to be like that.
Sorry if my answer sounded harsh, that was not the goal. English is not my native language, so I guess I could have found a better way to say that.
It's just that your statements made me think of what I used to think about other types of music, and learning more about them was eye opening to me. I just wanted to share that with you just in case it can be useful.