Thinking of buying Spitfire chamber strings/brass/winds collection. Yay or nay?

Discussion in 'SAMPLE Talk' started by mikefrommontreal, Nov 10, 2018.

  1. Ben E

    Ben E Active Member

    242
    647
    Jul 5, 2017
    I can't make the legatos work well with the woodwinds. They have clunky transitions. I use Berlin woodwinds primarily and augment them with Spitfire. Some of the Spitfire woods (the oboe and the bass clarinet, for instance) sing beautifully.
     
    Kony likes this.
  2. Ben E

    Ben E Active Member

    242
    647
    Jul 5, 2017
    I think you're right, now that you bring my attention to it. It's supposed to be yea. (I think.) Even in America.
     
    markleake likes this.
  3. William Palmer

    William Palmer Member

    94
    55
    Aug 7, 2018
    London
    2nd this - what's up with the woodwinds?

    I've had chamber strings for just over two months and can whole heartedly recommend the library.
     
  4. Kony

    Kony Bad ape

    1,126
    697
    Jul 29, 2016
    Interesting - I think SCS are quite smooth. We all have different tastes/preferences though
     
  5. SimonCharlesHanna

    SimonCharlesHanna Senior Member

    1,327
    818
    Feb 3, 2012
    Legato's are okay at best for most instruments (welcome to Spitfire) - The room sounds lovely though.

    The rest of the artics sound pretty good but there's a pretty poor amount of them compared to other libraries.
     
  6. Kony

    Kony Bad ape

    1,126
    697
    Jul 29, 2016
    How does BWW vanilla oboe compare to SSW?
     
  7. OP
    OP
    mikefrommontreal

    mikefrommontreal Active Member

    201
    176
    Jan 6, 2015
    How else would you spell it? I'm not spelling yeah or yea or ya. Just yay. I don't know if it's an American thing (I'm Canadian) but I guess it could be a North American thing. The yay or nay is more of an expression I guess.

    Anyway, you mentioned that SCS is a bit harsh for what you prefer to write. What do you prefer to write?
     
  8. Ben E

    Ben E Active Member

    242
    647
    Jul 5, 2017
    The Berlin Woodwinds have a better legato transition than Spitfire. But the Spitfire oboe sounds more beautiful. You can use the Spitfire "long" patch, don't overlap the notes, and get a beautiful oboe performance even though you're not taking advantage of the legato transitions. Here's a piece I did recently that uses Spitfire oboe throughout. In fact, all but the clarinet and the flute are Spitfire woods (Clarinet and flutes are Berlin.) But none of the Spitfire woodwinds in this piece are legato. They're all the "long" sustain patches with the midi notes butted against each other with no overlap. I used Spitfire bass clarinet, oboe and alto flute. Berlin clarinet and regular flute.
     
  9. Ben E

    Ben E Active Member

    242
    647
    Jul 5, 2017
    I made this woodwind legato comparison video a few months back.
     
    Nmargiotta, mikefrommontreal and rhye like this.
  10. Kony

    Kony Bad ape

    1,126
    697
    Jul 29, 2016
    Thanks for that Ben, it's really helpful - isn't it cheating though when your track is amazing and I'm mesmerised by it so as to be convinced lol :P

    Seriously though, I always enjoy listening to your music and thanks for sharing - and the Spitfire longs do sound good - and I was mesmerised by it. Having said that, there's a quality to the BWW oboe which I really find appealing.

    I grew up with an older brother oboist (he's had a good career - filling in for Heinz Holliger etc), and there's a quality to the oboe sound which I always look for after having heard oboe being practiced on its own for many years - and the BWW oboe has it in my opinion. The SSW oboe is good but it has this fat quality to it which is probably AIR - I think it softens the sound and isn't as sharp as the BWW oboe. Hard to explain really!

    We're all different though with different preferences shaped by our experiences - and I'm not saying I think the BWW is more accurate, just to my ears and experience. :)
     
    SimonCharlesHanna likes this.
  11. Uiroo

    Uiroo New Member

    39
    42
    Nov 6, 2018
    In one of the Spitfire videos i think they said something about how the height of the air studios causes a really nice kind of "highcut". Sounds like what you're talking about.
     
    Kony likes this.
  12. markleake

    markleake Recovering sale addict

    1,512
    1,131
    Nov 8, 2015
    Lots of pieces (not all) I write are slower and more relaxed, with a fuller orchestra sound where I don't want the violins for example to sound too pronounced or to stand out against the rest of the orchestra. That's why I don't use SCS much as my base library, because the violins can get a bit nasal sounding when you push the mod wheel up. Not to say SCS doesn't do well in many scenarios, it does, and I really like the library - I think it's one of the best out there. But for me at least, when I want something to blend and not stand out, I don't use SCS. Well, the main patches at least... flautando is another story.

    I've been using CSSS and also (shock horror!) NI symphony strings to add detail on top of my other strings. SSS mainly is my base, or CSS or CS2 sometimes also. SCS would probably work just as well to add on top of my base library, but the CSSS legatos are better. If I want chamber sized but a more blurred sound for the violins, then L&S Chamber Strings works better for me than SCS.

    But like I say, I tend to prefer writing with bigger string sections as a base, and adding in detail etc. from other libraries as needed. That's my usual approach. I'm learning to use smaller sections a bit now, so may start to use SCS more over time. So currently I may use SCS here and there, but other libraries a lot also.

    Basically, I have way too many string libraries, so have to come up with excuses to use them all. ;)

    Yea = yes, which is where "yea or nay" comes from. Yay = excited. I had to consult almighty google to be sure I wasn't going crazy.
     
    mikefrommontreal and Kony like this.
  13. Henu

    Henu Senior Member

    780
    884
    Nov 17, 2017
    Finland
    Here's something "in action": a bounced SSW group clip from a mockup I'm doing for fun/ practice at the moment.

    It's only quickly balanced and pre-mixed (not 100% tweaked, especially as they are not meant to be this "exposed" anyway) , utilizing close mics and my own reverbs. So just take it as WiP version to show how their overall cohesiveness is and how the legatos sound in general. And yes, the clarinet is freaking loud. Sue me. :D

     

    Attached Files:

    mikefrommontreal likes this.
  14. Karma

    Karma Spitfire Audio

    288
    344
    Apr 2, 2016
    London, United Kingdom
    Not to derail the discussion here, but as an example here's a mockup of some John Williams using only the SSO. I like to think it's at least a good representation of what you can expect from the libraries in this context.



    There's also no Symphonic Strings in there, just the extra mics of SCS Pro. Sounds bigger right? On reflection I would have probably used SSS too, although I definitely found it interesting how big SCS can sound in the hall.
     
    Nmargiotta, LamaRose, Nao Gam and 4 others like this.
  15. Henu

    Henu Senior Member

    780
    884
    Nov 17, 2017
    Finland
    Yep, the SCS Pro extra mics really make a difference. :) Did you layer them with two RR's too?
    I actually got all of the extra packages for their libraries when they were on the flash sale, and have thus far only used SCS which I loved and SSW which wasn't unfortunately such a difference to the original mics. When I have time, I'll definitely download and try the Brass next!
     
  16. Ben E

    Ben E Active Member

    242
    647
    Jul 5, 2017
    Yeah, I think you're describing exactly what I hear between Spitfire and Berlin with the oboe. The Spitfire oboe does sound fatter, which I really like. But I'm not used to hearing real oboes like you, so for me it's more a case of, "Wow! Sounds great! I'm gonna use that!" At the end of the day, comparing Spitfire woods and Berlin woods it just feels to me like Orchestral Tools were more careful all around to ensure the best possible detail and consistency. I've said it before in these forums but BWW is just one of those libraries that when I reach for it I always feel confidant that I'm going to be able to make it do what I want it to do. Spitfire Chamber Strings is the same. Other libraries sometimes put up a fight.
     
    Kony likes this.
  17. Karma

    Karma Spitfire Audio

    288
    344
    Apr 2, 2016
    London, United Kingdom
    No doubled RR's actually, but I did layer Solo Strings for certain lines. I think the Woodwinds benefit nicely from the Outriggers, it gives them a little more 'distance' which I love (it's also worth narrowing the stereo image slightly).
     
  18. Kony

    Kony Bad ape

    1,126
    697
    Jul 29, 2016
    I feel the same way about BWW. I need to spend more time with SCS (vanilla) to get to a point where I'm relatively happy though. I'm working on a piece at the moment where the cello performance legato on one of the notes has an abrupt end to it even though there is plenty of overlap with the next note - so I'm still learning the ropes with SCS (haven't used it enough!).
     
    SimonCharlesHanna likes this.
  19. Hat_Tricky

    Hat_Tricky Active Member

    274
    96
    Sep 19, 2015
    I already have Abion ONE, CSS, and was planning on getting CSSS. Would SCS or Berlin be better for "pop" or singer songwriter strings? main use would be orchestral/hybrid but i need something for pop/singer songwriter production. I was thinking Spirtifre Studio Strings since they are dry, but I'm not sure. SO many good things said about SCS
     
  20. OP
    OP
    mikefrommontreal

    mikefrommontreal Active Member

    201
    176
    Jan 6, 2015
    Beautiful piece. Had to follow on soundcloud
     
    Ben E likes this.

Share This Page