Spitfire Studio Woodwinds - Coming Soon

Discussion in 'SAMPLE Talk' started by Zoot_Rollo, Feb 8, 2019.

  1. stfciu

    stfciu Active Member

    171
    116
    Aug 13, 2017
  2. madfloyd

    madfloyd Active Member

    242
    125
    Jun 27, 2017
    Massachusetts
  3. Mark Schmieder

    Mark Schmieder Active Member

    455
    271
    Feb 4, 2019
    Concord CA
    https://audioplugin.deals/rhapsody-orchestral-percussion-by-impact-soundworks/

    Highly recommended library. Not the deepest compared to some smaller collections that don't try to do it all, but there are plenty of instruments in this collection that are now part of my regular palette due to the instruments chosen (vs. toys), correct technique, and good dry/wet balance.

    I use its orchestral bass drum and castanets, off the top of my memory. I'd have to check my notes to see what else made the cut above the competition. For those who don't own 10 TB of samples like I do, the ratio of use would be higher.
     
  4. Geoff Grace

    Geoff Grace Senior Member

    952
    1,112
    Apr 15, 2009
  5. Robert_G

    Robert_G It really is just an expensive hobby for me

    287
    188
    Feb 6, 2019
    So for those who are using the regular (not professional) version, how are you finding it being restricted to 1 mic? My question extends to the brass and strings too.
     
  6. Mark Schmieder

    Mark Schmieder Active Member

    455
    271
    Feb 4, 2019
    Concord CA
    Thanks, Geoff. It's only because the Keyboard Corner and MOTUnation aren't very active anymore, that I finally had time to join and participate here, after lurking daily since the forum's inception. :) I do not think that I will ever honour GearSlutz with my presence though. :)
     
    Last edited: Feb 18, 2019
    Geoff Grace likes this.
  7. miket

    miket Team Dany

    1,122
    1,274
    May 17, 2016
    New York
    I don't have the winds yet, but I'm a little frustrated being restricted to Tree 1 with the strings and brass. I imagine most people would be, unless that is the one sound they're ever going to want.

    Based on how much of a difference they make in BHCT, I'm very impatient to get the additional mic positions in the Pro collection, especially the Outriggers.
     
  8. muziksculp

    muziksculp Senior Member

    4,049
    1,354
    Dec 26, 2004
    Los Angeles
    Hi,

    SA Studio Woodwinds Pro is showing with a content of 432.0 GB UNCOMPRESSED .WAV
    From the product page info.

    * Download size : 102. GB
    * 102.0 GB DISK SPACE REQUIRED DURING INSTALL

    Wow...That's 1:4 ratio data compression. Can someone confirm that the library uncompressed size when installed is 432.0 GB ? or is their an error in this info.

    I'm still trying to decide if I should buy this library, I passed on all other Studio Titles from Spitfire, but feel the Studio Woodwinds are done very well, would also like to hear more demos showing the Oboe, English Horn, and Flute in a more exposed, lyrical composition.

    Thanks,
    Muziksculp
     
  9. I second that. I'm also about ready to pull the trigger but this info would help me decide.
     
  10. boxheadboy50

    boxheadboy50 Member

    134
    158
    Apr 5, 2018
    Woah, 432GB is a lot. Are you worried about filling up a hard drive? 432 is uncompressed, but assuming all the files are in .ncw format they won't actually take up that much space.
     
  11. Gerbil

    Gerbil Active Member

    215
    244
    Nov 14, 2017
    It's 94.1GB on my hard drive. The extra mics are 100% worth it though. Same with the brass.
     
    muziksculp likes this.
  12. neugens

    neugens New Member

    17
    5
    Apr 13, 2017
    I don't have it, but generally the compressed size is the one you need to care about, as the samples are encoded in the NI proprietary format, the rest is just marketing nonsense.
     
  13. babylonwaves

    babylonwaves Senior Member

    879
    546
    May 9, 2015
    why? uncompressed indicates how much recording time the library features. more recording time = more RR, more detail etc - does it hurt to know?
     
  14. Matt Riley

    Matt Riley Active Member

    I bought Studio Orchestra Pro and now would like to download from my MacBook Pro to my external SSD and then transfer the raw files to my PC to install there. Does anyone see any technical issues with that?
     
  15. Mark Schmieder

    Mark Schmieder Active Member

    455
    271
    Feb 4, 2019
    Concord CA
    It's funny, I misinterpreted that as well, and cleared out some disc space ahead of time, thinking I actually needed half a terabyte for the unzipped files! I was relieved when that turned out to just be the size of the original recorded WAV files.
     
    Last edited: Feb 19, 2019
    Silentspace2000 and muziksculp like this.
  16. muziksculp

    muziksculp Senior Member

    4,049
    1,354
    Dec 26, 2004
    Los Angeles
    Thanks for the feedback regarding the woodwinds Pro disc space requirement.

    I'm glad it's not around half a terabyte :)

    So, is it safe to say the library needs around 102. GB of disc space (after installation) ?
     
  17. Mark Schmieder

    Mark Schmieder Active Member

    455
    271
    Feb 4, 2019
    Concord CA
    I think someone else already confirmed the actual on-disc size, which should be roughly what you just said. I can't check from the office though. I was surprised how quickly it installed, after the download, as I thought it would take an hour to unzip etc.
     
    muziksculp likes this.
  18. neugens

    neugens New Member

    17
    5
    Apr 13, 2017
    Yes, but that's hardly meaningful. First of all, the same indication could be derived from the compressed size, it doesn't matter to know which is which. Then, perhaps some instruments have lots of RR some have less, some have detailed articulations some are cheaply constructed, you can't infer any meaningful information from the size of the uncompressed library alone. Also, since better compression happens usually means more redundant data in the file, a 75% reduction may indicate a lower quality of the recording, and if I were to judge from that alone I would probably be wrong. Also, in the pro version there are 8 microphone positions, so that's 8 times the same sample for each instrument. The truth is that we can't derive any of that from the file size alone, it's just not a measure that gives any valued information. Compressed is only meaningful because it tells you how much space is required for the library.
     
  19. muziksculp

    muziksculp Senior Member

    4,049
    1,354
    Dec 26, 2004
    Los Angeles
    What's also fascinating, (I think), is how much data-compression has been improved lately, we are talking a 1:4 ratio here, without losing anything data wise. (at least that's what I'm expecting). The compression-decompression algorithms must be doing some logical magic.
     
    neugens likes this.
  20. neugens

    neugens New Member

    17
    5
    Apr 13, 2017
    I agree, I've been trying to find some details on the NI file format but I didn't (anyone with pointers to public info?). FLAC can do up to 70% and is one of the best compression methods, I guess the NI algorithm may derive from that in some ways. I'm sure their algorithms are fine tuned for samples, where you generally expect samples to be ordered by pitch but otherwise stable in timbre and length.
     

Share This Page