Studio E
Eric Watkins
Also, dealing with bass players.
Lol! There is no "dealing" with bass players. I guess I assumed maybe they got easier to deal with once you take away their SVT.
Also, dealing with bass players.
Excellent thread!
As Quincy Jones said several years ago (maybe 20 years ago, and I paraphrase what I can remember:
" Now we have a whole bunch of people calling themselves 'musicians' and 'producers' who've never actually played a real musical instrument in their life.
...and the music of today suffers from this. These so-called 'musicians' don't know what it's like to breath life into an instrument, to have to play with other real people....to actually get the music into their bodies like a dancer has to....real musicians have to feel music in their bodies...they have to breath....react with other real people.
....todays music suffers from a lack of people having never actually played an instrument or done any singing in their lives. A lot of todays music is pretty lame."
(...I paraphrased a long interview to the best of my memory)
I'm so lucky to have been am still am a trombone player. I've worked with classical, jazz, rock, Latin, funk, pop, rock, soul, punk, ambient, Broadway, ballet, opera, new-age, fold, world, highly experimental, etc....etc....etc. musicians and groups.
I'm fortunate to know that sample libraries are only facsimiles of what real musicians are capable of. And it's very frustrating every time I have to use my 'in the box' production gear to create a project for which I can't be able to afford a group of real musicians. I feel like I lose part of my soul everytime I open up the DAW.
But....composing with sample libraries has also enable me to produce some works that would have killed a real trumpet player or drummer if they had to do numerous 'takes' over the course of a day while working in the box. (....and, I do have fun trying to replicate real people....it's a challenge!)
Anyways.... as I tell 'younger' musicians now who think they don't have to know anything about music, music theory, or having to play an actual instrument:
"Why limit yourself? Do you just want to be at the mercy of software producers for your musical life and experience of music? Don't you want to get hired by people doing other projects?....interact with other real people?....get hired by someone because you're really good at your instrument?....be able to play any musical style?.....to be able to read any music placed in front of you?....
...to help make the world a better place?...to take pride in being a creator of music? (not just a cut and paste producer)
Maybe do what I did. I deleted my entire 'Apple Loops' collection off my hard drive (...I don't even use Logic or Garageband, but still had it from years ago.) Toss 'em. Buy some other software that forces you to at least create something 'in the style of'. You'll learn more that way.
By a sample library, make your own sounds, learn the keyboard at least... go out and listen to some real musicians. Go hear a real orchestra and a jazz big band. Hear a string quartet play live.
None of us will ever be like Quincy Jones with his wealth of life experience, but it's someting to aspire to. A machine will never replicate what he's done with real musicians.
Too much work and too much money for all of that.
I can make three songs a day with computers. With real instruments, there are a lot more steps and money involved just to get a song to sound decent.
Quincy Jones and others grew up in a time where that was all they had. We have more, so why be ungrateful?
Are people really in that much of a need to limit themselves to using a real instruments and paying for studio time? The studio is in my laptop!
There is a simple test: listen to his music, then listen to yours. Is yours, regardless of genre or how it was created, of similar quality? He was one of the greatest at doing what he did. Can you say the same about yourself?
If not, a little humility might be in order.
I would not compare what I do to Quincy Jones. Of course he is in another league. He grew up in conditions that forced him to become proficient in as many instruments as possible. So he is great at what he does. I am doing something different.
Besides, humility is not my strong suit. I am only working to be great at what I do, not follow in others’ footsteps. I appreciate the groundwork others have laid down, but I am walking a new path.
But are you great at what you do or just egotistical? I don't know you or your work. But even many of the greats somehow remain humble. You might want to work on it. Just a suggestion.
I am great.
Please point me to where I can listen to some examples of your greatness
Hey, purely electronic music is music too. If you're cool with music that makes little attempt to emulate real instruments (you should be), why bother drawing a line between that and the stuff that does?
Not that I fully agree with the mentality, but I definitely understand it.
Agreed....some fantastic electronic music out there; even going back to the '60's and the real pioneers of electronic instruments. The early Moog experimenters did some amazing stuff.
Wonderful because it's a what good music should be....'organized sound'....and electronic music can take you 'places' that traditional instruments can't.....whole new sonic landscapes.... new colors....
Of course!
Check out "Run Hard" and "Triple Double": https://intervox.co.uk/en/To_The_Top_AID-4053?l=EN
Check out "Mellow Tick" and "Ticked Off": https://intervox.co.uk/en/Truth_AID-4018?l=EN
Check out "Boundaries Of Sensation": https://intervox.co.uk/en/In_Between_AID-2803?l=EN
Check out "Future Floss": https://intervox.co.uk/en/Gene_Coding_AID-3474?l=EN
Check out "Slow Forces": https://intervox.co.uk/en/Subtle_Traces_AID-2426?l=EN
Check out "Resist Temptation": https://intervox.co.uk/en/Hellfire_AID-2030?l=EN
Check out "Predator Militia": https://intervox.co.uk/en/Zoom_AID-1833?l=EN
Check out "All The Trappings": https://intervox.co.uk/en/Stylista_AID-3214?l=EN
Check out "Coin Operated Machine": https://intervox.co.uk/en/8_Bit_Beats_AID-2392?l=EN
Check out "Flutter By" and "Through Tepid Waters": https://intervox.co.uk/en/Aqua_Love_AID-2411?l=EN
Check out "Kooky Spooky Time": https://intervox.co.uk/en/Boo_AID-2294?l=EN
---
If you ever want to collab on some stuff, let me know. I'm always game to do business!
Definitely some good stuff there, especially the electronica, some not so good, especially the orchestral IMHO.
Yeah, great question. I have numerous 'next levels' and they are continuous rather than any sort of arrival points. I love the combination of real instruments and the wonders that are available with vst's etc., to me they are completely complementary when it comes to composing and recording. Of course nothing can compare to real instruments played live however what is also possible via computers these days is pretty mind-blowing and opens up endless possibilities for composers, as long as they learn their craft properly and don't fall into the trap of relying on the machine to 'replace' musical knowledge or instrumental skill. Without those it can all end up sounding pretty generic and samey imho.
Anyway, I aspire to keep becoming a better guitarist, to play piano better, to write better and better music, to keep developing my orchestration skills, to write faster, to get more listeners for what I have released and will release in the future, to get my music performed etc. etc. All-in-all my next level is to express what is inside me to the utmost of my ability so that when my time comes to leave this planet, I'll hopefully feel like I've gone some way to fulfilling my true potential as a composer and musician.
But if I only wanted to aspire to have a computer play my music all the time?
That'd be like wanting to always make love to a plastic doll .... I guess?....(haven't tried it!)
Something would always be missing!