I am not sure what you are getting at. I use articulation sets, but this doesn't keep me from having multiple tracks with BS.
You can do it if you use midi channels for each group, but I can't get Logic to send CCs reliably to omni (i.e., "any—it always reverts to a specific channel), so that means writing a script or finding one (there used to be some floating around the forum) to propagate the CCs across all the channels. Otherwise you end up with a very confusing CC situation when you switch from ord to trem, say, and end up switching back and forth between modulation for midi channel 1 and midi channel 2, for instance, rather than having the same CC sent to both channels. But if you can get the CCs to propagate, you can set each group into its own midi channel and then make the articulation sets address everything across midi channels.
I have an articulation set for the Kontakt version of BS that works that way and uses I think 5 midi channels. Babylon Waves has a Kontakt multiscript that takes care of getting the CCs across midi channels. That set up still has lots of issues, though, and I'm finding I prefer Sine with several tracks to Kontakt even though I can get it all onto one track in Kontakt. When I was working on a noodle last night I did it up using both the single track from Kontakt and with Sine and the whole process went much faster in Sine, even though I did the Sine version first. Moreover I had difficulty replicating the Sine version in Kontakt. I think I would have had to redo the Kontakt instruments so that the expressive long legato was in the same Capsule instance as the main legato and the soft legato (those were the articulations I was using). Programming the Capsule instances is just way more fussy than Sine, and Capsule just refused to do some things. Still finding workarounds for Capsule resulted in a plausibly better rendition, at least in this exposed setting. That's an interesting thing about workarounds—you sometimes stumble on a better solution.
Sine:
View attachment BS Noodle 1.1 Sine (NoVerb) 1.mp3
Kontakt:
View attachment BS Noodle 1.1 Kontakt (NoVerb).mp3
BS Violins 1 and 2 in octaves, violin 2 trimmed a bit under violin 1 using CC11. These are the tree mics out of the box with no other processing including no reverb. They are also programmed for contextual setting rather than being exposed like this, and the fourth note for the Sine version was originally programmed with a portamento, which I removed to make it conform to the Kontakt version. This resulted in a less than ideal legato transition that I didn't take time to fix, because I still want that interval to be portamento in the noodle I excerpted these from. Kontakt also has portamento available but it's rather hard to trigger properly with the Capsule legatos. The Kontakt version evidently has the CC11 pulled down too quickly at the end as well, resulting in a poor release.
One further point: I find the differences between these to be real but subtle, and also mostly within the range of programming, meaning skilled programming and mixing will make a larger difference with these libraries than will any differences in the libraries themselves. I also find the largest differences are in the workflow between Kontakt and Sine. And there I think Sine mostly comes out on top.
Still, I do feel like I'm fighting BS in Sine, that there are significant frictions to my workflow, and that it really wants to be used in a different way.