thevisi0nary
Senior Member
I am seriously interested in an AMD workstation. Unfortunately I have that stubborn anxiety with jumping ship to a new platform, as I've been using the 4790k since it came out and have no experience with Ryzen. I could use some help putting the scanproaudio daw bench in context with a real world work flow.
I would expect the 10900k to be somewhere about 20% better than the 9900k, but even with that the 3900x still looks fantastic here. The setup they use with Reaper + Rme Babyface is the same as mine so that is reassuring. My question is how these numbers apply to different projects.
1. Would these results look the same with heavier kontakt instruments? Say like OT capsule.
2. What happens when you have a ton of (say 60) instrument tracks, and then start putting fx on the master bus? Is the multi core benefit with a lot of tracks / plugin instances hampered by whichever one signal chain has the most fx?
3. How would AMD compare to Intel with cpu heavy synths? (Or is that not really relevant?)
Thank you for your help.
I would expect the 10900k to be somewhere about 20% better than the 9900k, but even with that the 3900x still looks fantastic here. The setup they use with Reaper + Rme Babyface is the same as mine so that is reassuring. My question is how these numbers apply to different projects.
1. Would these results look the same with heavier kontakt instruments? Say like OT capsule.
2. What happens when you have a ton of (say 60) instrument tracks, and then start putting fx on the master bus? Is the multi core benefit with a lot of tracks / plugin instances hampered by whichever one signal chain has the most fx?
3. How would AMD compare to Intel with cpu heavy synths? (Or is that not really relevant?)
Thank you for your help.