MAutoDynamicEQ experiences?


I'm working on several tracks and getting slowly to the point where I will start the mixing and mastering processes.

I've been putting some mixing and mastering plugins in my future purchases list during the last months and I already own the elements version of iZotope's Ozone 8 and Neutron 2.

But now I've seen Melda is offering this plugin MAutoDynamicEQ for around 30$ this week and wondering if it's worth the money and disc space or if I should rather save that money to get the advanced version of iZotope O8N2 at a later point.

I'm trying not to fill up my PC with too many plugins as I rather like to have a good overview of what I own and preferably specialize in fewer plugins rather than having basic knowledge of many of them. But this one looks pretty powerful for the money, so I wonder if purchasing this one would be good enough to avoid purchasing at least one of the iZotope plugins at a later point.

What do you think? Have you had any experiences with this plugin?

Beat Kaufmann

Active Member
Recently, there are more and more providers offering Dynamic EQs. Many of these plug-ins even have an automatic function. They observe the audio material for a short time and then propose several EQ points. That looks nice when a few filters "fidget" over the entire frequency range ...

First I liked this new type of EQ as well and used it everywhere.
But I soon realized that the mixes were characterless and somehow dead after the use of those EQs because everything was just "flat".
Today, I only use Dynamic EQs in a very targeted way. For example, if a singer begins to sound shrill with high notes, or when with a drum kit one of the three toms simultaneously produces a resonant frequency ...
The job of a dynamic EQ - in my opinion - is to dampen such resonances that do not always resonate. Therefore I iften use only one dynamic filter per audio channel ... or none at all of coarse ;)

If you've already used such Dyn-EQs in individual audio channels, I would not use Dyn-EQs again when mastering. And if so, then again very purposefully... At least not as OZONE suggests with a measurement over 10 seconds.
The dynamic EQ of OZONE sounds very neutral, you can set Attack and Release ... I do not know why you still have to buy MAutoDynamicEQ. ... Certainly not because of the "AUTO".

All the best
Last edited:


Senior Member
iZotope Ozone has a way that encourages you to go 100% "in house" and just stay within their tools. It's well designed that way. Good tools, though, so it's not a bad thing. But it should be a choice you make willingly. They are a formidable package, especially when purchased on a sale. In the end, I chose to go with an assortment rather than all-in-one. Ozone may not have the best individual tools (though still excellent), but it matters more that whatever tools you use allow you to easily get your work done - and they are good at that!

I bought Gullfoss - it's sort of a dynamic EQ, more for the master bus (but can be used well elsewhere). It also takes the place, in part, of some Ozone tools.