It has come to my attention that this thread is becoming a little extra sweet and understanding, so it‘s time for a little more heat and divisions. So don’t fire your holy water pistols at me yet…..hear me out..
Ok here it goes… From my experience and probably the slient majority; Production Music favours the Producer more than the composer.
So I’ve heard this many times, but a composer (which traditionally is someone who writes only the music) vs Producer (who knows which frequency and what the fk to compress in a mix) with android ears- who writes mediocre music gets further in this business...
So If you’re a good composer and know shit about mixing and mastering…you are phucked.
I understand in the world of Music Libraries, Production comes first, composition second. Let’s face it, there’s a formula which you can always take from reference tracks for structure and as long as you abide by them, your track will work.
It’s no wonder I hear frustrated composers moaning about it. They are being left behind not keeping up with the tech.
However, It’s forced me want to learn more about all that mixing, mastering witchcraft, it’s a very skilled profession and I’m in awe of it.
I also don’t want to be left behind in this business because music IT technician whizz kid can identify the problematic frequency of an ant fart with a blueprint structure with edit (whoosh swish) points. I’m not entirely convinced this type of work is in the same league as traditional composition, but that’s not to say it isn’t a highly skilled one.
That being said, I do know that some of you guys are actually Composers first and a producer second (in that order). You’ve had learn the craft of mixing and mastering, so well done to you. That’s impressive. It’s a bit of a black art for me. A fustrating one for…you guessed it! A composer, not a producer. He he. It’s late here, I’m rambling now, peace to all! Nites