JohnG
Senior Member
Whenever the question of resources comes up, odd hostilities about "overindulgence" or posturing erupts about "greater creativity from fewer resources."
What's with that? Does anyone know how much paper or how many quills Dante or Shakespeare used? Or whether they wrote better music because it got dark at 5 o'clock and it was hard to work all night?
I don't get it. The guys whose music I admire use very substantial resources -- computers, libraries, recording facilities, analogue synths -- you name it.
Use whatever you want. I don't like to juggle samples so they fit into a small RAM footprint so I use a lot of stuff. I got solar power to offset the carbon footprint.
Writing music is hard enough without getting normative about how much people "should" have or use.
What's with that? Does anyone know how much paper or how many quills Dante or Shakespeare used? Or whether they wrote better music because it got dark at 5 o'clock and it was hard to work all night?
I don't get it. The guys whose music I admire use very substantial resources -- computers, libraries, recording facilities, analogue synths -- you name it.
Use whatever you want. I don't like to juggle samples so they fit into a small RAM footprint so I use a lot of stuff. I got solar power to offset the carbon footprint.
Writing music is hard enough without getting normative about how much people "should" have or use.