Menu
What's new
By:
Filters

How do you remove harshness of Orchestral Samples ?

nuyo

nuyo

Active Member
Sampled Instruments usually have a lot of high end.
Do you know any plugins that can take them away by doing some "magic".
Just applying an EQ or Filter will always sound like just applying an EQ or Filter. ;)

I heard of Soothe but haven't tried it. The Kramer Tape can also do this.
Click to read more...
 
For me on strings it is usually 3K-4K where the harshness peeks out too much. A dynamic eq there always improves that. Of course flavor to taste per library (and track/cue).
 
Soothe is like Spider-Man. "With great power...", and so on. It is very good at times, but too much and oh boy everything sounds completely lifeless and neutered.
 
Dynamic EQs.
Sometimes automated EQs.

Keep in mind that sometimes the impression of "too much high end" may be brutally reinforced by other frequency areas.
(e.g. lately i had a case with Spitfire Symphonic Strings where an attenuation at 2.5 kHz completely changed the perception of the high mids between 6 – 7.5. kHz)
 
Henu said:
Soothe is like Spider-Man. "With great power...", and so on. It is very good at times, but too much and oh boy everything sounds completely lifeless and neutered.
Click to expand...

But that kinda goes for everything at anytime. ^^
I would use it on the Group Busses of every Section. Or maybe just on the whole Orchestra/Drum Bus.
 
My first impression is "don't". Been there, done that, bypassed EVERY TIME after a while until I learned not to do it at all in the first place.

Use it rather on single problematic instruments or let it only grab for the absolute worst and loudest a couple of resonances on the bus if you have to, but putting it on all busses doing stuff all the time makes everything sounding like a Roland synth from the late 90´s rather quickly. :D

You could also check out Gullfoss, which could work better on busses. I got it recently and it's actually really good on the 2-bus to tame the worst buildups a bit down. Haven't tried it on instrument busses but it could work also, if just used mildly.
 
nuyo said:
Yes definitely. But the problem here is definitely the fact that samples run digitally. So not high frequencies get lost during the process. And they all just add up. I think its the missing analog part of working completely in the box.
Click to expand...

Those frequencies that get lost in the analog domain aren't the ones responsible for the problems.
With analog equipment you can have even more harshness, if you happen to drive it in a way that enforces the high mids.
In fact, the actual harshness boom is quite a bit due to the fact that in our time analog characteristics are used in an exaggerated way.


The nasty frequency buildups - usually in strings - are an immanent problem of sampling. When musicians play music they always do micro modifications according to the musical content.
When playing static notes for sampling, resonance buildups occur.
And (as mentioned) since today everybody is raving for "analog" sound and vintage sound, the samples are sometimes recorded and processed in an exaggerated way.

I never have any resonance buildups with Vienna Instruments stuff, because they focussed a pristine, neutral sound.
 
As others have pointed out, mid-side dynamic EQ's generally work well: Pro-Q, Gullfoss (no MS however), Soothe, or any other alternative.
Also too much vibrato can cause a similar effect.
 
My feeling is that many scenarios (of course not *all* scenarios) can be explained by the difference in spectral timbre of the different libraries or different instruments relative to each other. If you're using a library that has a very smooth, warm sound, then another library might seem to have particular high frequencies stick out compared to that. Different libraries will have different emphasis on different ranges of high frequencies. A strings library for example that has very cutting sharp spiccato ostinatos might sound very shrill and scratchy compared to the room/ambient mics of a brass library. And this problem also even happens due to different articulations. Too many times I've tried to EQ matching by testing legatos only to find that the short staccato/spiccato articulations sound blatantly different, one of them particularly scratchy and shrill.

So yeah, +1 to any of the solutions people posted - dynamic EQ, multiband compression, EQ dips at certain frequencies, etc. and +5 to finding out that all my EQ changes sound worse than turning off the EQ =)
 
shawnsingh said:
My feeling is that many scenarios (of course not *all* scenarios) can be explained by the difference in spectral timbre of the different libraries or different instruments relative to each other. If you're using a library that has a very smooth, warm sound, then another library might seem to have particular high frequencies stick out compared to that. Different libraries will have different emphasis on different ranges of high frequencies. A strings library for example that has very cutting sharp spiccato ostinatos might sound very shrill and scratchy compared to the room/ambient mics of a brass library. And this problem also even happens due to different articulations. Too many times I've tried to EQ matching by testing legatos only to find that the short staccato/spiccato articulations sound blatantly different, one of them particularly scratchy and shrill.

So yeah, +1 to any of the solutions people posted - dynamic EQ, multiband compression, EQ dips at certain frequencies, etc. and +5 to finding out that all my EQ changes sound worse than turning off the EQ =)
Click to expand...
Interesting, I agree. Sometimes the contrast between the different elements in your track (different mic positions or recording halls across the libraries you're using altogether) makes your ears believe that your strings sound harsh.
As a side note, another way to reduce the so called harshness may be to use less of the spot and/or close mics and add in more of the ambient and tree mics. This is mainly because of how frequencies attenuate in energy.
 
@nuyo You didn't provide any context or examples.

There is no hard and fast "magical" method to treating samples. Or even audio for that matter. It depends entirely on the context of that particular piece of music. Mixing is about how the whole piece sounds, not how an instrument sounds in isolation.

"Harsh" sounds may not actually be harsh within the context of the entire piece, for example.
 
Ashermusic said:
Bingo.
Click to expand...
Jay Panikkar said:
@nuyo You didn't provide any context or examples.

There is no hard and fast "magical" method to treating samples. Or even audio for that matter. It depends entirely on the context of that particular piece of music. Mixing is about how the whole piece sounds, not how an instrument sounds in isolation.

"Harsh" sounds may not actually be harsh within the context of the entire piece, for example.
Click to expand...

I didn’t because the Problem appears on every Arrangement or individual Section. If you compare a Strings only piece with a real recording, the sampled strings tend to have a lot more high energy.
 
nuyo said:
Sampled Instruments usually have a lot of high end.
Do you know any plugins that can take them away by doing some "magic".
Just applying an EQ or Filter will always sound like just applying an EQ or Filter. ;)

I heard of Soothe but haven't tried it. The Kramer Tape can also do this.
Click to expand...

I tend to just listen to my sections on loop for an hour or so until I get ear fatigue and can no longer hear the harshness. Works every time :thumbsup:
 
Locks said:
I tend to just listen to my sections on loop for an hour or so until I get ear fatigue and can no longer hear the harshness. Works every time :thumbsup:
Click to expand...

It's exactly the other way around for me. ^^
Maybe I just need to take more breaks.
 
Besides everything already mentioned, I often like Decapitator set to the N setting and the tone knob adjusted to taste. Last night I also downloaded the Sonimus Burnley 73 eq and it seems to smooth out harshness a bit when using the saturation very lightly.
 
Living Fossil said:
In fact, the actual harshness boom is quite a bit due to the fact that in our time analog characteristics are used in an exaggerated way.
Click to expand...
Can you elaborate a bit on this? What analog characteristics would you say are exaggerated that would cause harshness? Thx
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom