Does Melody Even Matter??

Discussion in 'Composition, Orchestration & Technique' started by nickmurraymusic, Feb 21, 2019.

  1. nickmurraymusic

    nickmurraymusic New Member

    Feb 20, 2019
    Hey Guys,
    I wanted to open up this discussion on melody. Does it even matter?
    Check out my thoughts on it here and would love to hear what you think!
    Mason and Akarin like this.
  2. studiostuff

    studiostuff Active Member

    Dec 15, 2015
  3. AlexanderSchiborr

    AlexanderSchiborr Senior Member

    May 1, 2014
    Hi there,

    You like your spiccato..I don´t know..what to say to that video. But maybe rename it: How to produce an epic mediocre music track with samples. I most of the time disagree with such weak assessment you present here which is very superficial and your example isn´t even showing me any little point why melody doesn´t matter. In fact it just shows me the exact opposite. I am sorry, know I could have written: Oh thank you for your video, yeah your music track definitely proves your thesis, but its not for me. Sorry man, I simply can´t because I sit here and see a guy hammering some random lines in his daw without any purpose and touching anything which would tell the audience about why to reject melodic cohesive context. Man..and there are so many great examples from repertoire which you could have featured worth a presentation, instead your example proves why we have such bad written and ineffective music out there. Its just my opinion for sure, but you asked about feedback so I give here my assessment.

    And don´t get me wrong: Its nothing against you personally of course.
    Last edited: Feb 21, 2019
  4. Jimmy Hellfire

    Jimmy Hellfire Senior Member

    Jun 28, 2015
    Alexander doesn't screw around :grin:

    But I agree. The role of the melody in music, and whether you need it or not, is a complex discussion. In a sense, melody is everything - but Slayer didn't need melody.

    However, the only thing that the example in this video proves is that you can full well write music without melody and have it sound like your average fare epic media fart. Not sure that was in dispute in the first place. The message seems to be: no, you don't have to think about melodies or anything. Just write some bullshit like this, somebody's gonna eat it up anyway! Not sure that was intended. So yeah, it's kind of counterproductive and seems to encourage people to just don't give a damn and confidently produce bad music - melodic or not.
    NameOfBand, Greg, Quasar and 2 others like this.
  5. AlexanderSchiborr

    AlexanderSchiborr Senior Member

    May 1, 2014
    And Slayer has done great songs, definitely I enjoy them. I wished he would approached that subject very different.
    toomanynotes likes this.
  6. I don't have 31min to see if you're just being provocative, but I really hope you are :)
    aaronnt1, Ledwick and d.healey like this.
  7. gregh

    gregh Senior Member

    Feb 1, 2015
    melody matters when you want a melodic piece - otherwise not. In a more global sense, melody has not been a requirement of interesting music for close on a hundred years - just one of the tools in the toolbox
    stprodigy, R. Soul, patrick76 and 4 others like this.
  8. mikeh-375

    mikeh-375 old school

    Feb 8, 2016
    Melody isn't necessary in some cases to be fair - mainly in media applications - but try being a composer of orchestral music and not have it, at all. Most orchestral music will have a sense of line and momentum and whilst rhythm can do this, it's pretty hard to not come up with even a riff to sustain interest in extended writing generally speaking. That riff might be harmonic in nature, but is still something to hang one's hat on. Don't forget inner part writing, counterpoint, foreground/background writing etc, all needing a sense of line and musicality that a good melodic sense can impart. So maybe a cue or two can be all hands down to the keys to play footballs (semibreves), but as composers, we need more than that.

    Nothing provocative at all here, if you agree with the thread title, you are not a good orchestral or instrumental composer imv, and if you want to be, you need to go back to school.
    Last edited: Feb 22, 2019
    I like music and Ledwick like this.
  9. asherpope

    asherpope Member

    Jan 23, 2014
  10. gregh

    gregh Senior Member

    Feb 1, 2015
    that's sepcial case of orchestral you raise though - there has been a stack of orchestral music for decades where meldoy is not central. Sure in the commercial world of film or whatever it is important, and also in some aspects of the classical concert scene - but by no means is it a universal - it's justone of the aspects of music to be used, or not

    I'm not hostile to melody - I love melody
    Last edited: Feb 22, 2019
    Ledwick and CGR like this.
  11. CGR

    CGR Pianist/Composer/Arranger

    Jan 14, 2016
    This thread reminds me of the story of the BBC2 TV series called 'The Old Grey Whistle Test' - the title of which was derived from the fact that if the Old-Grey-Coated-Cleaners at the BBC were whistling a melody they heard on a BBC2 music programme following a recent broadcast, it was almost certain to be a hit.
    toomanynotes and poetd like this.
  12. KallumS

    KallumS Active Member

    Jul 26, 2018
    Camden, London
    Nothing really matters
    Anyone can see
    Nothing really matters
    Nothing really matters to meeeeeee
    dzilizzi and CGR like this.
  13. DivingInSpace

    DivingInSpace Active Member

    Feb 10, 2018
    If we are talking about the thrash metal band Slayer, most, if not all, of their "hit songs" mostly became popular because of iconic melodies, the melodies being in the riff. Raining Blood has a pretty strong and iconic melody, and same goes for South of Heaven.
  14. AlexanderSchiborr

    AlexanderSchiborr Senior Member

    May 1, 2014
    I have to admit, after rewatching that video, I can only assume it has to serve a comedic purpose. At least I hope so.
  15. muk

    muk Senior Member

    Jan 21, 2009
    That c-d-f-e is a very unfortunate choice of an example. First of all, it is a motif, not a melody. The result you get from using that motif is simplistic. It may be polished production-wise, but there is no musical content to speak of.

    And that's where the second point comes in why it is such a bad choice of an example. Because somebody has written some of the greatest music of all time with that exact same motif - c-d-f-e. It's not a fair comparison by any means - everybody's music can't do anything but pale in comparison. Hence, really poor choice of a motif.

    Compare this:

    to this:

    The rest of the video doesn't answer the question in the title at all. In fact, it doesn't even start to consider it in my opinion.
    Last edited: Feb 22, 2019
    NameOfBand and tadam like this.
  16. Illico

    Illico Samuel Le Tonquèze

    Depending to your audience... if it's VI-Control, you probably keep Mozart one. If it's Teens the first one is good. If you want to stuck a melody on mind, repeat it, repeat it, repeat it, repeat different ways, it's much more cool.
  17. Jimmy Hellfire

    Jimmy Hellfire Senior Member

    Jun 28, 2015
    If you define any interval change as essentially melody, yes. :grin:
  18. mikeh-375

    mikeh-375 old school

    Feb 8, 2016
    True enough Greg. But even in works where melody isn't part of the expression or featured, a sense of line (which one could reasonably consider a form of melody), or purpose and impetus in the individual parts (orchestral that is) is still needed if only from a practical viewpoint. This purpose could also be reasonably said to be melodic in a way. I think we should all develop a sense of line in our musical thinking and that comes about by thinking melodically too even if the line is an inner part.
    Still, all said we are in agreement and I was as you say, referring to a few specific genres of music.
    brunodegazio and Ledwick like this.
  19. Ledwick

    Ledwick Member

    Feb 5, 2019
    The track still has harmonic movement...

    To summarize the video, you're basically playing an AC DC style chord progression on the guitar and saying "did I write a song?" Well yes, technically...

    Rather than the click bait title, just be honest and say what your implying, "What's the least amount of work required to make something people like". The answer is none, nothing requires any work because someone, somewhere will like it. It's actually a positive message when you think about it.

    I'm looking forward to the next video... "Do notes even matter?"

    Keep up the good work! :thumbsup:
    NameOfBand likes this.
  20. DS_Joost

    DS_Joost One day I'll fly away!

    Nov 19, 2015
    Depends on what you are trying to create. I think melody matters absolutely, and can truly help create a sense of progression in a story where it sometimes is sorely needed.

    However, I think that this video touches upon another concept that honestly, I do not understand at all, and I see it pop up all the time:

    The ability of some composers to write a cue completely in a vacuum.

    So, how does that relate to your question?

    The thing I see in many modern composers, and for me the reason why many cues sound so generic and lifeless, is because they are devoid of context. I cannot for the life of me understand how someone can sit down behind their computer and say 'well today I am going to write something sad and epic'.

    Why I don't understand it, is that I cannot just force myself to write something like that. It needs more. It needs a reason to exist. Whether that is an emotion, or a grander idea, there needs to be context for a cue, for me at least, to exist. What am I trying to tell people, what is the story? Without a story, it's just a bunch of noise. And there is a lot of noise out there.

    You play a simple string of notes and ask yourself; is this good?

    Without context, I wouldn't know. Because I don't know what it's trying to say to me.

    If I want to tell a story, I need a melody. A strong one, one that can be bend, twisted, manipulated. I need to be able to play with it's accompanying harmony, need to be able to transpose, modulate and turn it around. Because doing so is actually telling the story. In the simplest terms: for me, in order to tell a story, I need to be able to switch a melody from triumphant to sad, to happy, to mysterious at the drop of a hat. But without context whatsoever, I am creating a melody in a vacuum. It doesn't tell me anything. It's nothing more than a bunch of good sounding notes stringed together. Sure it's loud. And I feel... well... something. But that's it.

    That is why melody matters. Because for me, it tells a story that I want to tell through the way I can manipulate it.
    SimonCharlesHanna, dzilizzi and CGR like this.

Share This Page