I haven't noticed any significant latency but I normally leave it deactivated until I bounce my mix.Interested in those using it on virtual tracks. Causes a bit of latency for me, anyone else?
I haven't noticed any significant latency but I normally leave it deactivated until I bounce my mix.
For those that have used Ozone, how does Gullfoss compare?
Ozone? What part?
Nothing does exactly what Gullfoss does. You can get some of what it does from TB ProAudio DSEQ 2. Do you need it? No. But can it work some subtle magic? Yes.
Latency isn't that noticeable for me, I use it while playing live all the time.Interested in those using it on virtual tracks. Causes a bit of latency for me, anyone else?
Ah. The Exciter part of Ozone has some overlap. But Ozone 9 can't do what Gullfoss does as quickly and easily, if at all. The reverse is also true!I'm just wondering what sort of overlap there is especially with respect to the "AI" mastering functions of Ozone.
What if 3 lads who dont even have an address on their website, decided to create some fake plugin by adding 1.5db more in the 7k range, dynamic eq in mid lows, and a fancy curve there to make it look like theres some genius analysis going on? You put a price on it so it has a professional price and have some team for marketing. Sure it does subtle improvement to many ears.
Go to https://soundtheory.com/support then click on Manual(English) to download the official Gullfoss manual where you can find the registered company address on page 3. Our team is spread over the entire globe, so there's little use for this address other than for legal issues.
And I'm sure that if you try Gullfoss yourself you will find that there's nothing fake about it and neither is it subtle. If you have questions regarding the technology I'm happy to do my best to answer them.
Go to https://soundtheory.com/support then click on Manual(English) to download the official Gullfoss manual where you can find the registered company address on page 3. Our team is spread over the entire globe, so there's little use for this address other than for legal issues.
And I'm sure that if you try Gullfoss yourself you will find that there's nothing fake about it and neither is it subtle. If you have questions regarding the technology I'm happy to do my best to answer them.
@PeterN I don’t get it — what would having an address tell you? Especially in an age where software developers often work remotely?
In case you missed it...
Gullfoss v1.7.0 update was released July 14th
download at https://www.soundtheory.com/support
v1.7.0 (2020-07-14)
• Added “session bypass” affecting all instances accessible by shift-clicking the bypass button.
• [WIN] Improved processing performance.
v1.6.3 (2020-06-05)
• Fixed an issue that could lead to the mouse pointer vanishing.
• [MAC] Fixed an issue with audio unit instantiation on older macOS versions