Double Helix
[no data]
That bit from 4:17 onwards has got to be some of the dirtiest techno ever…
D*MN!
(Now I need to take a long shower)
That bit from 4:17 onwards has got to be some of the dirtiest techno ever…
I have indeed checked HISE a couple of times. It is a really interesting project. Congratulations!You don‘t need to do custom DSP programming in HISE unless you want to.
The best resource you can find for learning HISE is David Healey‘s patreon account.
Well, this thread seemed to be one of those rare situations in which something really interesting and constructive was proposed, and I would have certainly enjoyed it staying on course.
All this lasted for half of its first page, then as it always happens, it went into the same things repeated ad nauseam in any other thread: my fav synth vs your fav synth, modular is better (but which one? let's discuss), ...
Definitely agree with you.I have several of the other major contenders in the big combination sampler/synth space. And I probably would already have bought Falcon to add to my collection, if there was ever a 50% off sale for the software itself. It's pretty much how I got to my current collection in the first place (Omnisphere being the exception). I'm less interested in "free additional content" sales, since lately I'm drawn more to making my own sounds than using 3rd party libraries. But I've only seen a max of 30% off on Falcon sales.
Sonically, nothing.to see what I might be missing with Falcon that I don't already have with HALion, MSoundFactory, Omnisphere, Hyperion, Kontakt, Reaktor, etc.
Couldn't disagree more. Although I prefer making my own patches I think Falcon's Factory library is an excellent showcase of the vast possibilities Falcon has to offer, which is the point.Definitely agree with you.
Personally, I'd love to see manufacturers selling instruments without content at a lower price. Maybe call it something cool like "sound designer's edition"
Regarding UVI, I get why they would give a $100 voucher when getting Falcon. The factory presets aren't great, so expand it with whatever type of sounds you prefer. I'm not sure it's a good strategy though considering Falcon is generally regarded (at least here on VIC) as a sound design playground.
I don't own Falcon (yet) so I admit I've never actually heard the factory library for real. I based my opinion on the Youtube videos I've seen and many comments I've read here on VIC saying something like "don't buy Falcon for the presets, buy it for sound design".Couldn't disagree more. Although I prefer making my own patches I think Falcon's Factory library is an excellent showcase of the vast possibilities Falcon has to offer, which is the point.
I think it would be more accurate to say Falcon excels as a sound design tool. As I mentioned earlier it's an overly complex synth for typical "patch surfers". That's not to say the factory content isn't excellent, it is, however you get far more presets with many other synths at a similar price point such as Arturia's V Collection.I don't own Falcon (yet) so I admit I've never actually heard the factory library for real. I based my opinion on the Youtube videos I've seen and many comments I've read here on VIC saying something like "don't buy Falcon for the presets, buy it for sound design".
I'll let you know my opinion in a couple of weeks!
I find it interesting that a lot of people describe Falcon primarily as a sound design tool.and most of all and most importantly to me, very musicianly-oriented.
Could you elaborate on this?While it can obviously do nice sound design, I find it much more of a musical instrument (which you would perform on) than something like MSoundFactory or PhasePlant.
The whole organization thing with Falcon (Multis, Programs), including the fact that it actually has a Mixer and a Performance tab (you can do live performances from Falcon standalone if you want to), a lot of attention on Sequencers/sequencing toolset for creating actual musical phrases, the approach of favouring the layering of various synth modules to get a nice musical part instead of a very technical approach that lets one modulate everything with everything (Reaktor, MSF and other).Could you elaborate on this?
Why would Falcon be more of a musical instrument than say Phase Plant?
Same here.Since buying Falcon, I've removed Omnisphere from my system.
I basically associate that with IRCAM.God, I love clinical precise!
I think Arturia's UX and is important to note. It is much better at organizing presets. You can tag and categorize them. Easier to find content. Falcon doesn't offer that. Falcon is definitely better as a complex synth.I think it would be more accurate to say Falcon excels as a sound design tool. As I mentioned earlier it's an overly complex synth for typical "patch surfers". That's not to say the factory content isn't excellent, it is, however you get far more presets with many other synths at a similar price point such as Arturia's V Collection.
It's The Imp of the Perverse.I am simultaneously strongly attracted to and repelled by MSoundfactory (I've just tried the demo). The vast crazy synthesis and fx possibilities obviously. Actually I'm often weirdly drawn to off-putting synths- oddities and ugly ducklings not 'on point' trendwise- I'm not sure if it's sympathy/feeling sorry for them or just plain perversity on my part... I really don't like the look of the guis that the synths within MSoundfactory have been given (the standard look of their fx I find ok). But if they stop labelling mics as 'mikes'- that might be enough for me to jump aboard...