EvilDragon
KSP Wizard
There's no panning per oscillator.
Unfortunately, I believe those results might be skewed towards teenage amateurs who are dabbling on MacBook Pros, and weighted away from professionals who've invested tons into workstation beasts. I'm just guessing, I really don't know, but it seems plausible.Also I'm quite sure NI did their market research and saw what percentage of 5,1 users make up their userbase, and made the call.
Unfortunately, I believe those results might be skewed towards teenage amateurs who are dabbling on MacBook Pros, and weighted away from professionals who've invested tons into workstation beasts. I'm just guessing, I really don't know, but it seems plausible.
Is there any way to "force" this to run on a Mac Pro 2012? My boss is one of those professionals with a lot invested into a workstation beast, and was totally blindsided by this AVX compatibility. Is there an extra bit of software we can run to trick the program into just using the computer's existing resources?
You think they are all going to get rid of their 5,1 MacPro just in order to run MassiveX? I don't think so...
If 8 years is "too soon", I wonder when the right time would be. Never? Yeah, right.
NI looks like they're at least aware that people were unhappy with the lack of clear signaling about the AVX requirement out of the gate, because when I upgraded to Komplete 12 yesterday, a note specifically about Massive X requiring AVX came up during the purchasing process.
That's not to say that they won't consider SSE2 version some time later
Sorry guys. To argue that NI should cater for a tiny fraction of the userbase at the expense of everyone else is nuts.
Sorry guys. To argue that NI should cater for a tiny fraction of the userbase at the expense of everyone else is nuts.
Well...you wanted NI to develop an non AVX version of the plugin. But doing so would have (probably) delayed the release and made the synth less efficient for everyone else. So...No one said that