What's new

John Powell's Updated Template

You open a folder stack A with at least one track in it and then drag folder stack B in it above that one track within stack A. Only works with folder stacks, not with group (summed) stacks.

Doesn't work, are you sure you did it this way?
The way I remember and confirmed by trying again is that you can only have "Summing" stacks inside a "Folder" stack.
 
Last edited:
Doesn't work, are you sure you did it this way?
The way I remember and confirmed by trying again is that you can have many "Summing" stacks inside a "Folder" stack.
Hmmm.. I think you might be correct. I haven't used LPX in few months, so there's a small (HUUUGE) chance that I remember incorrectly.
 
Logic does this brilliantly.
Even AUX tracks assigned to a multi output instrument can send midi.


One of the handicaps for me in LPX is exactly this, the way it creates and handles multitimbrals. It's like rocket science to be able to control pan / volume on tracks within a multitibral.
 
Guesses on how many slaves ? He used to have a huge machine room.

I'm not on FB but anyone want to privately invite him over to this thread worth a try?
 
He replied to a few comments:

"1 Mac Pro running Logic X and some samples, 2 PC samplers and 1 Mac Pro running PT for mix."

"Custom percussion may end up in the final mix. Orchestral instruments always get recorded live."

"64gb of ram on Macs and 128gb of ram on PCs. 4 TB of hard disk space."

"6 SSD's all together running in 3 machines"

Updated my original comment to include more info he has given.
 
How does professionals record live orchestra when you use sample libraries with ultra over the top ensembles? You can't get that sound with just a pretty regular orchestra? Say, something like Trailer Strings etc.
 
SSS + CSS or SCS + CSS? Curious to know what the layering adds as I wasn't sure if they'd go together well (looking into Spitfire myself right now)

My goodness the next developer to come out with a strings library needs to name it something starting with like a J, Q, or Z or else string library discussions are just going to be posts of jumbled C's and S's.

"Has anyone tried out CCSCSS? How well does it blend with SSCCSC?"

"Moreso than SCSSCSC, but not as well as SSCSSSCCSCCSSCCCSSCCSC."
 
Top Bottom